Troubleshooting Campaigns with the Leaky Pipe Analogy

tips and tricks

troubleshooting campaigns with the leaky pipe

thesis

By deploying a leaky funnel analysis when troubleshooting campaign performance, you can ensure you – or your paid digital executors – are focusing efforts to find the cause of problems and delivering specific actionable solutions.

focusing analysis by visualizing the pipe

In this context, the pipe is a synonym for the user journey. It is the journey that a user takes from the time they click on your link to the conversion event that is your primary objective.

What’s important to understand about this pipeline is that different metrics are available to be optimized at different stages: metrics that are earlier in the pipeline typically influence those that are later in the pipeline. For example, a key metric that is often optimized towards as a business objective is Cost per Acquisition (CPA). CPA going up may be a cause of concern, but rising CPAs never implicates a specific action or set of actions because CPA has several inputs that can be influential. This can be illustrated by the different ways in which CPA can be calculated.

Total Spend / Total Conversions = Cost Per Acquisition/Conversion

This is the main way that CPA is calculated, but this method gives the least information about its other inputs. It cannot be used to triage campaign performance.

Cost Per Click (CPC) * Clicks * Conversion Rate (CVR) = Cost Per Acquisition

This is another way to calculate CPA and is far more useful for identifying potential causes of campaign performance fluctuations. Performing analysis with this model allows us to see which metrics are causing performance shifts.

Within this, we can see how leading variables like CPC and Conversion Rate influence the lagging variable which is CPA in this case.

  • If the CPC goes up, then CPA will go up even if your conversion rate stays the same.
  • Similarly, if your conversion rate goes down, your CPA will go up even if your CPC remains the same.

This may seem trivial or simplistic, but it is crucially important to methodically troubleshooting performance. An executor that doesn’t break lagging metrics down into the leading metrics that influence them may not have an understanding of these how these metrics relate to one another and which they have control over. After all, we can’t just “make the ROAS go up,” we have to make tweaks that positively influence ROAS, which is where the leading metrics come into play.

Following are some examples of action items that I would consider depending on which variable moved and how it moved.

If CPC changes
  • Pull reports on auction insights to determine if competitors could be driving up auction costs.
  • Pull a search term analysis to see if search terms skewed towards higher/lower cost queries
  • Pull demographics reports to see if gender, income, or age demographics may have changed period over period. (different demographics have different average costs)
  • Troubleshoot ad quality & ad relevance, which may impact what CPCs search engines allow you to pay. Consider revising:
    • Ad Copy
    • Landing Pages
if CVR changes
  • analyze landing page metrics that affect the user experience and thus conversion rates
    • Bounce Rate (which is a lagging indicator in a different sense)
    • Load Speeds
    • Layout changes
  • Pull page paths and behavioral reports. Perhaps users are engaged but they’re exiting your conversion path in search of more or specific information.
  • Pull demographics reports to see if gender, income, or age demographics may have changed period over period. (Different demographics may engage or convert differently.)
  • Consider AB testing landing pages to determine if landing page qualities could improve CVR.

As you can see, the metrics to look into and fix are fairly different. The fact that the action items are so different is exactly what exemplifies the need for an analytical method that points executors in the proper direction for isolating problems and finding opportunity.

Actionable takeaways

  1. When tracking changes in campaign performance, don’t focus on KPIs like CPA, ROI/ROAS, etc. Focus on the leading metrics that influence the down funnel metrics that determine performance.
  2. Develop hypothesis that drive testing strategy. Don’t just pull every lever at once. Develop a set strategy for achieving the end objective and test different tactics in sequence.

Boosting Conversion Rates by 16% through the power of CRO

Case Study

Boosting Conversion Rates by 16% through the power of CRO

The Gist

  • To expand the reach of a prominent career training institution with 16 campuses nationwide without overburdening the internal marketing team.
  • The project was led by the narrator, implementing Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO) tests to improve the overwhelming inquiry form design and achieving a 15.5% increase in Request For Information (RFI) conversions.
  • The successful CRO project not only covered its cost but also provided a competitive edge, proving the value of collaborations with specialized agencies in higher education.

Background

My primary objective was to expand our reach to a larger student base without overwhelming our marketing department’s resources. As a leader in the career training institution sector, we operate 16 campuses nationwide. We recognized the need to establish connections with more prospective students and suspected that our website design wasn’t effectively engaging today’s higher education seekers. Given the limitations of our internal marketing team in both capacity and Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO) expertise, making changes without diverting attention from ongoing high-priority projects was challenging.

Execution

I took the initiative to lead the CRO project, enabling our career college to maintain its focus on departmental priorities. Leveraging my higher education-specific conversion data and proven ideas, I designed and executed CRO tests with my team. We functioned as an extension of our marketing department, allowing us to swiftly implement strategic, data-driven tests on our school’s inquiry form without increasing our internal teams’ responsibilities.

One crucial aspect of the inquiry form test was the use of heatmapping tools to monitor prospective student behavior on the form, pinpointing where they abandoned it. To our surprise, we discovered that users were leaving the site before even beginning to share their information due to the overwhelming form design. Backed by our industry research, I decided to revamp the form.

The learnings we gained from this process were then put to the test as we designed and implemented a new form, comparing its performance against the original. I was thrilled to see that form abandonment was drastically reduced, resulting in a remarkable 15.5% increase in Request For Information (RFI) conversions.

The results of the CRO project were truly impressive. The financial impact of the additional student inquiries more than paid for the entire year of CRO services, all while sparing our marketing department from added responsibilities. Beyond the cost and time savings, I gained the peace of mind of knowing that we were no longer leaving potential students behind and had a user experience innovative enough to give us a competitive edge against other institutions.

Takeaway

In the realm of higher education, I recognized the potential for increasing student inquiries and took charge of the project. In collaboration with a specialized agency, I was able to offer my client access to proven data and strategies without overburdening our resources. The results we achieved, as mentioned earlier, were substantial, significantly improving our lead generation efforts on flat spend with no additional investments.